On
CRAC and on Art That Is Pulled Off
by Annika Hansson
There
is some art that you manage to pull off and some that you dont. CRAC (Creative
Room for Art and Computing) is one of the reasons why so much of contemporary
art in Sweden is pulled off, brought off, carried through, realized, fulfilled,
completed, brought to fruitionor however you want to put it.
CRAC is not a high-profile player in the art world but for whoever is trying
to get a grasp on the different facilities and forms of production available
to contemporary Swedish art, CRAC is a given. An artist-run media
lab for various forms of digital technologies is a description of
CRAC as bone dry as it is accurate. But to describe the role CRAC plays
in contemporary art, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattaris old
rhizome really fits the bill again. These two French gentlemen used the
rhizome as a metaphor for a non-hierarchical networkone now adopted
by the Internet, among other places. In the case of CRAC, however, the metaphor
will serve to emphasize something that is not always visible but whose existence
is vital for what shoots up to the surface, the surface here being the Swedish
and international art scenes and their audiences.
CRAC is itself an indicator of how the geography and hierarchy of the art
world has changed in recent years. Artists no longer see any good reason
to wait around for invitations from others with more initiative. The time
of artists as wallflowers is past; they are now creating their own networks
to make things happen. There are also no longer any clear-cut reasons for
an artist to relocate to a major metropolis. Contemporary art has become
local and global at the same time and artistic work can happen both at the
center and at the periphery. And as far as CRAC goes, if a problem, a good
idea, and a promising space all meet on a windy street in Stockholm, then
artists will take things into their own hands. And that is roughly how CRAC
started once upon a time.
For
artists working with digital technologies and production in the 90s, the equipment
was painfully expensive. A few people in Stockholm were saying that none of
them had the money or even the desire to make their studios or apartments into
a mini technologyland. One solution, they thought, was to split the costs and
maybe create a shared space where for a nominal fee you could have access to
the most advanced equipment. Said and done! In 1997, the work was complete and
CRAC could start to accept members. From a few founding members and work stations,
CRAC now has 30 cutting-edge work stations and roughly 350 active artist members
from both Sweden and abroad. News of CRAC and the people who make it possible
has slowly but surely spread. Today, there are many contacts between CRAC and
other Swedish and international groups. These contacts comprise both massive
institutions and lone individuals active in art, technology, and research. In
this way, CRAC has developed from a quite local concern to a national and international
space for both the production and the discussion of digitally-based art.
During CRACs lifetime, Sweden has undergone what the media has named
the IT Revolution. From CRACs point of view, it must seem
somewhat strange to see how society and capital have now suddenly opened
their eyes to the digital tools and forms that artists have been familiar
with for a long time. To be working in such an interim period has been,
and still is, both pleasant and laborious for CRAC. In the era of IT in
Sweden, CRAC is one of the few places within the sphere of art that offers
room for a both critical and enthusiastic examination and discussion of
what the Internet and related phenomena mean for art and communication.
What happens at CRAC is above all
about multiplicity and avoiding uniformity. CRAC seems every now and then
to function as the least common denominator for the many and very different
members and artistic concerns. There are people here who use digital media
as an essential part of their artistic practice and others who do not let
the technology have a prominent place in their final output. Here we find
both the groups whose work is shown in prestigious international exhibits
and the circles who work is visible in the national and local art scenes.
There are people who practically live in front of the work stations and others
who show up a couple of times a year. We could go on, but the point is that
CRAC is characterized by the members diversity rather than their similarity.
CRAC is far from being a trademark for a certain kind of art or a certain
kind of artist.
It is nevertheless true that several of the younger Swedish artists that are
now attracting a great deal of attention on the international art scene are
CRAC members. Success is hardly the main criterion within the walls of CRAC
but artists of such caliber are nevertheless important ambassadors for an
organization that welcomes all practicing artists to apply for membership.
In return for membership, CRAC ask for a small annual fee, a heavily subsidized
hourly fee for using the equipment, and a minimal fee for materials used.
And CRAC would certainly be grateful for any acknowledgement from better-funded
institutions which receive massive discounts on the production costs of so
much contemporary work because the artists have individual memberships in
CRAC. But that is a whole other discussion, as they always say whenever questions
of cultural politics come up.
Annika Hansson
Editor-in-chief, CRAC in Context www.crac.org
Translation: Sina Najafi
Lotta
Antonsson
Anders
Boqvist
Jon
Brunberg
Nils
Claesson / Rolf Lindgren
Peter
Hagdahl
Karin
Hansson
Annika
von Hausswolff
Carl
Michael von Hausswolff
Mats
Hjelm
Henrik
Håkansson
Arijana
Kajfes
Ulrika
Karlsson, David Erdman,
Marcelyn Gow, Chris Perry
Anita
Malmqvist
Tore
Nilsson
Gunnel
Pettersson
AnnSofie
Sidén
Ingvar
Sjöberg, Thomas Broomé, Jakob Lindström
Sven
Westerlund